C Magazine May/June 2010 : Page 24

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Archive
  • Advertisers
  • News Feed
  • CHSInc.com
  • YouTube
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

2010 CHS Legislative Positions Climate Change CHS is urging Congress to end federal legislative and regulatory efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. The projected annual cost to CHS from the Waxman-Markey Bill passed by the House would be $685 million or an extra 50 cents on every gallon of fuel and an estimated energy cost increase of $7 per acre for crop and livestock producers. If a climate change bill is approved, CHS believes refiners should not have to account for greenhouse gas emissions in the fuels they produce, that a carbon tax would be preferable to a cap-and-trade system, and that agribusiness and small refiners need financial assistance to comply with bill mandates. Agricultural Taxation Congress should continue tax credits for renewable fuels production and blending and restore a 9 percent manufacturer tax break to farmer-owned cooperative refiners. CHS is also calling on Congress to maintain the ability of farmer-owned cooperatives to use the “last-in, first-out” (LIFO) accounting method for refinery inventories. Protecting Cooperatives Congress must protect and support the Capper-Volstead Act and related laws that allow farmers and ranchers to join in cooperative efforts. CHS Director Randy Knecht, Houghton, S.D., left, outlines the cooperative’s 2010 legislative agenda for U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.). New Voice Along with changes in administrations, congressional players and issues, the CHS board’s approach has evolved since early visits. Positions are fine-tuned, background papers are prepared on each representative or senator, and succinct messages and leave-behind materials are created to make the most of limited time. Although conversations on major issues such as climate change legislation and agricultural programs dominate the visits, occasionally directors must build understanding and support for less controversial technical issues important only to cooperatives. Tenacity often wins out. It took a decade before a modest change in cooperative dividend allocation tax law won passage as an add-on to a more significant piece of legislation, resulting in higher patronage returns. Knecht believes the key to success is being a voice congressional staffers don’t hear every day. “We’re both agricultural producers and constituents,” Knecht says. “I’m able to share how a piece of legislation is going to affect me and other producers.” While the four-person CHS Government Affairs team works on issues year-round and maintains strong relationships with industry and trade associations, the annual board visit sets CHS apart from other companies. “Directors bring credibility and reliability that’s appreciated by staffers,” says Bob Looney, vice president, CHS Government Affairs. “They’re recognized as being educated on their issues and not just stating positions, but providing solutions. Twenty years of visits has created that reputation. “We get results from this,” he adds. “The directors help facilitate continued contacts with these offices and help open doors for us at regulatory agencies and legislative offices throughout the year.” CHS has gained respect as an information source, Looney says. Legislative staff members call the CHS Government Affairs team to ask how a bill revision might affect an individual farming operation or agribusiness, or they may ask for background information to better understand a constituent’s concern. And CHS is regularly invited to testify on Capitol Hill and participate in agency meetings. 24 May/June 2010 CHSINC.COM

Issue Articles

Issue List

Spring 2021

Winter 2021

Fall 2020

Summer 2020

Spring 2020

Winter 2020

Fall 2019

Summer 2019

Spring 2019

Special Issue

Winter 2019

Fall 2018

Summer 2018

Spring 2018

Winter 2018

September/October 2017

July/August 2017

May/June 2017

March/April 2017

January/February 2017

November/December 2016

September/October 2016

July/August 2016

May/June 2016

March/April 2016

January/February 2016

November/December 2015

September/October 2015

July/August 2015

May/June 2015

March/April 2015

January/February 2015

November/December 2014

September/October 2014

July/August 2014

May/June 2014

March/April 2014

January/February 2014

November/December 2013

September/October 2013

July/August 2013

May / June 2013

March/April 2013

January/February 2013

November/December 2012

September/October 2012

July/August 2012

May/June 2012

March/April 2012

January/February 2012

November/December 2011

September/October 2011

July/August 2011

May/June 2011

March/April 2011

January/February 2011

November/December 2010

September/October 2010

July/August 2010

May/June 2010

March/April 2010

January/February 2010

November/December 2009

September/October 2009

July/August 2009

May/June 2009

March/April 2009

January/February 2009

November/December 2008

September/October 2008

July/August 2008

May/June 2008

March/April 2008

January/February 2008

December 2007

Previous  Next


Library