C Magazine July/August 2011 : Page 24

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Archive
  • Advertisers
  • News Feed
  • CHSInc.com
  • YouTube
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Grain shipping from the CHS export elevator on the Gulf of Mexico at Myrtle Grove, La., could benefit long term from Panama Canal expansion. The broader impact of the wider and deeper third channel when it opens in three years remains to be seen for the U.S. shipping system, including East and West Coast ports and those on the Gulf of Mexico. Increased container shipments could be among the first benefits for East Coast ports, provided they are dredged deeply enough to handle the larger vessels that will eventually follow. Soybean transportation and other commodity groups are trying to assess the impact on agriculture, particularly on its primary grain export channels to Asia down the Mississippi River through Gulf of Mexico ports and the Panama Canal, or through Pacific Northwest ports via rail from the Midwest. CHS Has Options Grain exporters also have a vested interest in these new capabilities. That group includes CHS, with a ship-loading elevator on the Center Gulf and two terminals in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) that could all feel the impact of increased Gulf competition. This multiple export-channel capability, which also includes St. Lawrence Seaway access from its Superior, Wis., terminal, continues to give CHS the flexibility to ship through the channel that gives the company and its grain shippers the best freight breaks and end-customer access. CHS grain merchandisers say the improvements should help Gulf export facilities like the one it operates at Myrtle Grove, La., remain competitive. That terminal could handle larger cargo ships with relatively minor improvements. For the foreseeable future, though, soybean trader Chris Pothen and corn trader Jason Marthaler say Panamax ships will continue to be used because the new channel will be deeper as well as wider. That means the same vessels will be able to handle more grain because of gains in draft. Pothen says the additional capacity could close some of the Gulf of Mexico competitive gap over PNW ports by $2 to $3 per ton. It also will increase the U.S. advantage over South American grain exporters. PNW Remains in Play CHS is involved in two PNW export facilities: an export elevator it owns at Kalama, Wash., and a joint venture operation at Tacoma, Wash. Those ports, connected by unit-train shuttles to western United States and Midwest growing regions, are expected to remain price-competitive. Plus, combined train and ship transport through the PNW takes about half the time involved in transporting goods from the Canal to the Gulf, even with reduced waiting times at Panama. It generally takes 18 days to ship soybeans to China through the PNW, says Pothen, compared to the 35-day voyage from the Gulf, where waiting times at the Panama Canal now can be up to five days. End customers in China could benefit immediately from Canal expansion, points out Pothen, because its relatively new ports can already handle mega cargo ships. In countries including Japan, Korea and Taiwan, though, Marthaler says much hinges on whether they decide to expand ports to handle larger corn cargoes. “The old limiting factor was the size of Panamax ships,” Marthaler adds. “The new limiting factor will be destination ports.” 24 July/August 2011 CHSINC.COM

Issue Articles

Issue List

Spring 2021

Winter 2021

Fall 2020

Summer 2020

Spring 2020

Winter 2020

Fall 2019

Summer 2019

Spring 2019

Special Issue

Winter 2019

Fall 2018

Summer 2018

Spring 2018

Winter 2018

September/October 2017

July/August 2017

May/June 2017

March/April 2017

January/February 2017

November/December 2016

September/October 2016

July/August 2016

May/June 2016

March/April 2016

January/February 2016

November/December 2015

September/October 2015

July/August 2015

May/June 2015

March/April 2015

January/February 2015

November/December 2014

September/October 2014

July/August 2014

May/June 2014

March/April 2014

January/February 2014

November/December 2013

September/October 2013

July/August 2013

May / June 2013

March/April 2013

January/February 2013

November/December 2012

September/October 2012

July/August 2012

May/June 2012

March/April 2012

January/February 2012

November/December 2011

September/October 2011

July/August 2011

May/June 2011

March/April 2011

January/February 2011

November/December 2010

September/October 2010

July/August 2010

May/June 2010

March/April 2010

January/February 2010

November/December 2009

September/October 2009

July/August 2009

May/June 2009

March/April 2009

January/February 2009

November/December 2008

September/October 2008

July/August 2008

May/June 2008

March/April 2008

January/February 2008

December 2007

Previous  Next


Library