C Magazine January/February 2015 : Page 14

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Archive
  • Advertisers
  • News Feed
  • CHSInc.com
  • YouTube
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Maria Abbott, product development specialist and agronomist for CHS Crop Nutrients, left, and Paul Trcka, precision agriculture manager at CHS in Grand Meadow, Minn., examine the eff ects of applying starter fertilizer at planting. > near Loudonville, Ohio, and Pendleton and Rochester, Ind. She and Eastern Region Account Manager Ed Hopkins conducted visual field inspections, determined growth stages and made qualitative comparisons among starter treatments. “Regardless of planting date and growth stage, plants treated with XLR-rate were taller and had thicker stalks and bigger leaves,” she says. “Plants at the V5 and V6 stages had a healthier, stronger appearance, which translated to a more abundant root system compared to plants that had received no starter application. Healthier plants are better able to handle adverse conditions.” Potential Yield Impact Those growth advantages can translate to bigger yields and faster fall drydown, says Abbott. “But that often depends on the growing conditions,” she says. “We tend to see the biggest benefi ts from starters in cold, wet springs, during early or late planting, when soil phosphorus levels are low, or when plants suff er from signifi cant stress such as heat or drought.” Tolk points to the extreme spring conditions last year in eastern South Dakota as most likely the reason for the consistent yield bumps he observed on plots that had starter fertilizer. “In side-by-side trials on the cooperative’s 9-acre corn test plot, we compared use of 10-34-0 starter fertilizer, XLR-rate 7-23-5 and no starter, all with and without a micronutrient package. Both starters produced signifi cantly higher yields — yields that would increase grower profi ts. “On the side of the plot where soils were not as good, the XLR-rate rows outperformed the 10-34-0 rows by 5.2 bushels per acre,” says Tolk. “That was probably because the 10-34-0 wasn’t broken down in the soil and available to plants as quickly as XLR-rate was. That’s a major advantage of the orthophosphates in XLR-rate.” Applying a micronutrient package with XLR-rate produced an extra 15 bushels per acre. Tolk mixes his own micronutrient blend that includes chelated copper, iron, manganese and zinc. XLR-rate formulations are available with optional micronutrient packs (MNP). The take-home results, Tolk says, are that starter fertilizers pay, and micronutrients, especially zinc, are a worthwhile addition. “I tell growers that zinc and phosphorus go hand in hand, and adding zinc to a starter is mandatory in my book,” says Tolk. “Phosphorus ties up zinc, so more is needed to make sure it’s available to the plant. In every trial where zinc was added, we saw a yield bump.” Benefi ts for Other Crops Howard Farmers Co-op test plots also included starter fertilizer trials with soybeans and the results were generally positive, says Tolk. “Due to some crop damage mid-season, we lost one of our replications, so I’m less confi dent in last season’s data. But we’ll be including soybeans in our starter trials again this coming season.” Research at North Dakota State University in 2014 showed promising results when giving sugar beets extra nutrients at planting. Preliminary data showed the use of XLR-rate starter fertilizer in furrow resulted in more tonnage and more recoverable sugar per ton, especially when using XLR-rate 2-17-17. A few North Dakota growers who ran informal trials with XLR-rate on sunfl ower acres reported a signifi cant diff erence in early crop growth between treated and non-treated parts of the fi eld, says Jon Berglund, western North Dakota account manager for CHS Crop Nutrients. “Treated sunfl ower acres reached maturity one week earlier. That caught the attention of growers in our part of the country.” There was tremendous interest in XLR-rate in 2014, says Michael Johnson, director of marketing, CHS Crop Nutrients. “We exceeded an aggressive annual sales goal and volume sold more than doubled from 2013 to 2014.” ■ Plants treated with starter fertilizer were taller, with thicker stalks, bigger leaves and more abundant root systems. 14 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 CHSINC.COM

Issue Articles

Issue List

Spring 2021

Winter 2021

Fall 2020

Summer 2020

Spring 2020

Winter 2020

Fall 2019

Summer 2019

Spring 2019

Special Issue

Winter 2019

Fall 2018

Summer 2018

Spring 2018

Winter 2018

September/October 2017

July/August 2017

May/June 2017

March/April 2017

January/February 2017

November/December 2016

September/October 2016

July/August 2016

May/June 2016

March/April 2016

January/February 2016

November/December 2015

September/October 2015

July/August 2015

May/June 2015

March/April 2015

January/February 2015

November/December 2014

September/October 2014

July/August 2014

May/June 2014

March/April 2014

January/February 2014

November/December 2013

September/October 2013

July/August 2013

May / June 2013

March/April 2013

January/February 2013

November/December 2012

September/October 2012

July/August 2012

May/June 2012

March/April 2012

January/February 2012

November/December 2011

September/October 2011

July/August 2011

May/June 2011

March/April 2011

January/February 2011

November/December 2010

September/October 2010

July/August 2010

May/June 2010

March/April 2010

January/February 2010

November/December 2009

September/October 2009

July/August 2009

May/June 2009

March/April 2009

January/February 2009

November/December 2008

September/October 2008

July/August 2008

May/June 2008

March/April 2008

January/February 2008

December 2007

Previous  Next


Library